Reviewers
Review Guidelines
For the review Please assess the quality and originality of the work you are asked to review.
Regarding quality, please pay attention to the following aspects:
1. Quality of the content:
- The title and abstract respond to the content of the paper.
- Clarity and coherence in each section and in the paper as a whole.
- Currentness and relevance of the reference sources used to frame the work.
- Relevance of the objectives and coherence between the objectives and the methodological decisions.
- Procedural rigor and clarity in presenting all methodological details.
- Quality of data analysis. Order, clarity and relevance of the results presented.
- Coherence in the discussion and conclusions in relation to all previous contributions.
- Critical analysis of the limitations of the study.
- Implications of the contributions of the work for professional intervention or for the development of new research.
2. Formal quality of the work:
- Guidelines for authors and publication standards are met.
- The title and abstract are easily intelligible.
- The length is adjusted to the quantity, quality and novelty of the information presented.
- Tables and figures are pertinent and provide information that is not redundant with the text.
- Tables and figures are easily intelligible and contribute to improve the communicative effectiveness of the article.
- References are complete and agree with those cited in the text and those listed in alphabetical order at the end of the paper.
Regarding originality, please, evaluate:
- There is no indication of plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
- The approach, objectives, methodological approach and/or results are sufficiently original and relevant in relation to the subject studied to justify the interest of the publication.
- The interest and usefulness for the academic and professional community interested in advances in Psychology.
Conflict of interest
If during the review process you have identified any possible conflict of interest in relation to the work under review, please inform the journal and refrain from making a judgment on the suitability of the article and from recommending its acceptance or rejection.
Please accompany your review with the following statement:
I declare that I have no conflict of interest in reviewing this paper.
REVIEWERS FOR THE 2022-2024 PERIOD
|
Rafael T. Andújar Barroso |
Universidad de Huelva (España) |
|
|
Félix Arbinaga Ibarzábal |
Universidad de Huelva (España) |
|
|
Mª Francisca Arias Holgado |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
María Ángeles Ballesteros Duperon |
Universidad de Granada (España) |
|
|
Santiago Benjumea Rodríguez |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Marisol Blanco Ruiz |
Universidad de Córdoba (España) |
|
|
Mª Jesús Cala Carrillo |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
José Carmona Márquez |
Universidad de Huelva (España) |
|
|
José Julio Carnerero Roldán |
Univ. Internacional de La Rioja (España) |
|
|
Joaquín Castillo de Mesa |
Universidad de Málaga (España) |
|
|
Mª José Chaves Groh |
CIEM. Universidad de Costa Rica |
|
|
Carmen Delgado Álvarez |
Univ. Pontificia de Salamanca (España) |
|
|
Pablo Delgado Herrera |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Marta Díez López |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Francisco Fernández Serra |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Virginia Ferreiro Basurto |
Universitat de les Illes Balears (España) |
|
|
Carlos J. Flores Aguirre |
Universidad de Guadalajara (México) |
|
|
Mª Xesús Froxán Parga |
Univ. Autónoma de Madrid (España) |
|
|
Juan Manuel García Haro |
SESPA, Asturias (España) |
|
|
Manuel A. García Sedeño |
Universidad de Cádiz (España) |
|
|
Gabriel González de la Torre |
Universidad de Cádiz (España) |
|
|
Mónica Guerrero Molina |
Universidad de Extremadura (España) |
|
|
Georgina Guilera Ferré |
Universitat de Barcelona (España) |
|
|
Antonio Hernández Mendo |
Universidad de Málaga (España) |
|
|
Victoria Hidalgo García |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Lucía Jiménez García |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Jesús Pablo Jodra Jiménez |
Univ. de Alcalá de Henares (España) |
|
|
Daniel J. López Vega |
Consejería de Salud, Cádiz (España) |
|
|
Alfonso Luque Lozano |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Violeta Luque Ribelles |
Universidad de Cádiz (España) |
|
|
Juan José Macías Morón |
Univ. Europea de Madrid (España) |
|
|
Rafael Martínez Cervantes |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Rocío Martínez Gutiérrez |
Universidad de Granada (España) |
|
|
Héctor Martínez Sánchez |
Univ. de Guadalajara (México) |
|
|
Isidro Maya Jariego |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Inmaculada Moreno García |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Mª Carmen Moreno Rodríguez |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Beatriz Morgado Camacho |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Mª Carmen Ortiz Fune |
C.A. Universidad de Salamanca (España) |
|
|
Virginia Paloma Sánchez |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Águeda Parra Jiménez |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Santiago A. Resett |
Univ. Austral - CONICET (Argentina) |
|
|
Yolanda Rodríguez Castro |
Universidad de Vigo (España) |
|
|
José Manuel Rodríguez González |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Juan Francisco Rodríguez Testal |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Eva Mª Romera Félix |
Universidad de Córdoba (España) |
|
|
Christian A. Romero Méndez |
Univ. del Valle de Puebla (México) |
|
|
Solana Salessi |
U. Catól. Santa Fe-CONICET (Argentina) |
|
|
Andrés Sánchez Prada |
Univ. Pontificia de Salamanca (España) |
|
|
Mª Eva Trigo Sánchez |
Universidad de Sevilla (España) |
|
|
Carmen Viejo Almanzor |
Universidad de Córdoba (España) |
